Act Acting » Actor Actress » Rate my pic

Rate my pic

Question:

"Metal" <nosmapple…@somewhere.com> wrote in message

news:Xns94B2948DFC08Ct45fs6vve@130.133.1.4… > Remember me? > http://www.hotornot.com/r/?eid=GZRLG8H&key=EQD

ooh!  You’re brave. I don’t want to vote though, because I can’t recognise hotness in men.  Can you post your score here so I can see it?

Response:

"Pumpkinhead" <pumpkin_head060…@hotmail.com> wrote on Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:33:50 GMT in alt.support.shyness: > I don’t want to vote though, because I can’t recognise hotness in > men.  Can you post your score here so I can see it?

When enough people vote.

Response:

"Psymaster" <nosmapple…@somewhere.com> wrote in message

news:Xns94B2C975CA342t45fs6vve@130.133.1.4… > "Pumpkinhead" <pumpkin_head060…@hotmail.com> wrote on Sat, 20 Mar > 2004 17:33:50 GMT in alt.support.shyness: > > I don’t want to vote though, because I can’t recognise hotness in > > men.  Can you post your score here so I can see it? > When enough people vote.

Good idea.

Response:

Metal wrote: > Remember me? > http://www.hotornot.com/r/?eid=GZRLG8H&key=EQD

You’re the kind that can get away with that ‘heavy-lidded’ look. : ) – Michaela

Response:

"Pumpkinhead" <pumpkin_head060…@hotmail.com> wrote on Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:33:50 GMT in alt.support.loneliness: > I don’t want to vote though, because I can’t recognise hotness in > men.  Can you post your score here so I can see it?

After 41 votes, it gives: 8.1 You are hotter than 79% of men on this site! Should I believe this?

Response:

Psymaster wrote: > You are hotter than 79% of men on this site! > Should I believe this?

People say "no" because most people just give a rating so they could move on to the next photograph.

Response:

MCMLXVI <mar…@earthlink.net> wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:27:40 GMT in alt.support.loneliness: > People say "no" because most people just give a rating so they could > move on to the next photograph.

That’s why the site doesn’t give an average, but a weighted rating considering how everyone votes.

Response:

On 21 Mar 2004 05:16:39 GMT, Psymaster <nosmapple…@somewhere.com> wrote: >"Pumpkinhead" <pumpkin_head060…@hotmail.com> wrote on Sat, 20 Mar >2004 17:33:50 GMT in alt.support.loneliness: >> I don’t want to vote though, because I can’t recognise hotness in >> men.  Can you post your score here so I can see it? >After 41 votes, it gives: >8.1 >You are hotter than 79% of men on this site! >Should I believe this?

Yes. You’re cute. We’ve established that in two threads now. So what’re you gonna do about it? lm

Response:

"Psymaster" <nosmapple…@somewhere.com> wrote in message

news:Xns94B36530AA468t45fs6vve@130.133.1.4… > MCMLXVI <mar…@earthlink.net> wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:27:40 GMT > in alt.support.loneliness: > > People say "no" because most people just give a rating so they could > > move on to the next photograph. > That’s why the site doesn’t give an average, but a weighted rating > considering how everyone votes.

I’m on there… somewhere. Look for a 30 year old with a perfect 10!

Response:

"Clockmeister" <no-…@nowhere.com> wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:07:22 GMT in alt.support.loneliness: > I’m on there… somewhere. Look for a 30 year old with a perfect 10!

Just post the direct link.

Response:

"Psymaster" <nosmapple…@somewhere.com> wrote in message

news:Xns94B3C50B9A629t45fs6vve@130.133.1.4… > "Clockmeister" <no-…@nowhere.com> wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:07:22 > GMT in alt.support.loneliness: > > I’m on there… somewhere. Look for a 30 year old with a perfect 10! > Just post the direct link.

You do the hard work… (I’ll think about it)

Response:

On 21 Mar 2004 17:28:33 GMT, Psymaster <nosmapple…@somewhere.com> wrote: >lm <lmandtheb…@mailandnews.com> wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:05:33 >GMT in alt.support.shyness: >> Yes. You’re cute. We’ve established that in two threads now. >Sorry for the two threads. It was a little silly.

What’s up with the two *names*? (Just curious.) — RK

Response:

Psymaster <nosmapple…@somewhere.com> wrote in message <news:Xns94B2C975CA342t45fs6vve@130.133.1.4>… > "Pumpkinhead" <pumpkin_head060…@hotmail.com> wrote on Sat, 20 Mar > 2004 17:33:50 GMT in alt.support.shyness: > > I don’t want to vote though, because I can’t recognise hotness in > > men.  Can you post your score here so I can see it? > When enough people vote.

maybe you are good looking but you still have the ethnic look. you need to be white, rich, handsome, athletic and smart before a girl will consider you. it is a competion.

Response:

RK <coo…@pdq.net> wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:46:36 GMT in alt.support.shyness: > What’s up with the two *names*? > (Just curious.)

I messed up the identities on my newsreader.

Response:

rambler…@yahoo.com (nothingbutthetruth) wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2004 04:34:13 GMT in alt.support.loneliness: > maybe you are good looking but you still have the ethnic look. you > need to be white, rich, handsome, athletic and smart before a girl > will consider you. it is a competion.

What’s the ethnic look?

Response:

>> maybe you are good looking but you still have the ethnic look. you >> need to be white, rich, handsome, athletic and smart before a girl >> will consider you. it is a competion.

 Nope. They dont have to be white, women prefer dark guys. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->What’s the ethnic look?

Response:

dudenephx1…@aol.com (DudeNEPhx1971) wrote in message

<news:20040322095003.00909.00000158@mb-m18.aol.com>… ** nothingbutthetruth ** >> maybe you are good looking but you still have the ethnic >> look. you need to be white, rich, handsome, athletic and >> smart before a girl will consider you. it is a competion.

** DudeNEPhx1971 ** > Nope. They dont have to be white, women prefer dark guys.

DudeNEPhx1971 is right. Didn’t you guys learn anything from Jim Summers87? Also, where are you getting "smart" from? Have things changed that much since the 1970’s? Back then, smart meant "nerd", which was a girl-repellent. But this was before the "geeks are cool" computer revolution, so perhaps things are different now. (Note: By smart, I really mean smart, and not just not dumb-as-an-ox.) Virgo Cluster   "[10 All-Time Most Disastrous Royal Marriages] (#3) Philippe,    Duke of Orleans, brother of Louis XIV of France, was married    to his second wife, the Bavarian Princess Elizabeth, in 1760.    Although the duke was one of history’s most famous homosexuals,    French court etiquette required that he had to have not only a    wife, but also a full-time, fully paid official court mistress.    It was a terrifying prospect for Philippe, as his new wife    stood at least 18 inches taller than him. Most of the time    the statuesque Princess Elizabeth was consigned to the edge    of the bed, from where she regularly crashed to the floor.    However, the couple were able, for dynastic purposes only,    to produce three children. Philippe revealed afterwards that    this had only been possible because he had on each occasion    rubbed his penis with a holy medal for luck." << Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless    Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 29 >>

Response:

gamma_n…@yahoo.com (Virgo Cluster) spewed forth most vilely from the darkest depths of chaosnews:dd95baf2.0403221215.19cb5138@posting.google.com: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> dudenephx1…@aol.com (DudeNEPhx1971) wrote in message > <news:20040322095003.00909.00000158@mb-m18.aol.com>… > ** nothingbutthetruth ** >>> maybe you are good looking but you still have the ethnic >>> look. you need to be white, rich, handsome, athletic and >>> smart before a girl will consider you. it is a competion. > ** DudeNEPhx1971 ** >> Nope. They dont have to be white, women prefer dark guys. > DudeNEPhx1971 is right. Didn’t you guys learn anything from > Jim Summers87? Also, where are you getting "smart" from? > Have things changed that much since the 1970’s? Back then, > smart meant "nerd", which was a girl-repellent. But this > was before the "geeks are cool" computer revolution, so perhaps > things are different now. (Note: By smart, I really mean smart, > and not just not dumb-as-an-ox.) > Virgo Cluster

In a recent Vanity Fair, super-hot (as in career-wise) actress (yes, I said ACTRESS, ’cause she’s a big WOMAN, and the word "actor" is too damn good for her) Keira Knightley  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0461136/ is referred to as a "drama-geek". Right.  She’s a geek.

Response:

"The Strange Case of Dr. Carlo Lombardi" <a…@at.org> wrote in message <news:Xns94B47FBDAF03Frefusetoactcom@68.6.19.6>… ** Virgo Cluster ** >> Have things changed that much since the 1970’s? Back then, >> smart meant "nerd", which was a girl-repellent. But this >> was before the "geeks are cool" computer revolution, so perhaps >> things are different now. (Note: By smart, I really mean smart, >> and not just not dumb-as-an-ox.)

** The Strange Case of Dr. Carlo Lombardi ** > In a recent Vanity Fair, super-hot (as in career-wise) actress > (yes, I said ACTRESS, ’cause she’s a big WOMAN, and the word > "actor" is too damn good for her) > Keira Knightley > http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0461136/ > is referred to as a "drama-geek". > Right.  She’s a geek.

A while back I looked up and posted what "nerd", "geek", and "dork" supposedly mean —>                  ********************************                  ******************************** http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dd95baf2.0211092110.78048…@posting.google.com From:       Virgo Cluster (gamma_n…@yahoo.com) Subject:    Re: q for the guys Newsgroups: alt.support.shyness Date:       2002-11-09 21:10:14 PST cos…@marihuana.ro (Xile) wrote in message

<news:eb213e64.0211091514.10ab687b@posting.google.com>… > You might expect some attraction from their part > at first(after all you are atractive and dorkish,

                                           ^^^^^^^ Hummm…I’ve been wondering how the terms ‘nerd’, ‘geek’, and ‘dork’ differ —-> http://www.nerdworld.com/lf_what_is_a_nerd.html ** The typical definition of a Nerd is someone who is passionate ** about an activity that is not necessarily mainstream. Typically ** these activities have to do with technology or academia. In ** addition to the passion, there has always been an aura of being ** a social outcast associated with the term Nerd. http://www.darkwater.com/omni/geek.html ** A geek is someone who spends time being "social" on a computer. ** This could mean chatting on irc or icb, playing multi-user ** games, posting to alt.sex.bondage.particle.physics, or even ** writing shareware. Someone who just uses their computer for work, ** but doesn’t spend their free time "on line" is not a geek. Most ** geeks are technically adept and have a great love of computers, ** but not all geeks are programming wizards. Some just know enough ** unix to read mail and telnet out to their favorite MUD. http://groups.google.com/groups?th=e831b404fece8a4f ** [...] a "dork" is a human at that awkward intermediate state ** between being a child and an animal/"adult", around 12 or 13 years ** old. At this age, the individual is typically clumsy, from growing ** too fast, with oddly long arms and legs, big ears, big feet… ** in males, a voice which is at times bass and adult sounding, ** frequently cracking into a high pitched squeak. And at this age, ** the individual has a hysterical mix of stupidly naive but ** distinctly "adult" thoughts, with a schizophrenic carry-over of ** childhood fantasies, and a Quixotic plan to change the world. ** This is the basic "dork" image, yet the term is generally ** reserved and applied to individuals who are still like this ** into their twenties and thirties, and beyond. It is a total ** mistake to confuse this with "nerd" which has some underlying ** elements at times of "dorky" but is a distinct type.                  ********************************                  ******************************** I’m not sure what the distinctions between these words were when I was growing up, but I think "geek" and "dork" both meant about the same thing — roughly what the above says "dork" means — and "nerd" was characterized by an extreme interest in (ability in was neither necessary nor sufficient, by the way) math, physics, electronics, astronomy, or chemistry. Regarding the last three, you only qualified to be a nerd if you actually did things like . . . electronics — You only used radios that you mostly built yourself                (nerds-in-training used Heathkits), you knew Morse                code well enough to easily communicate with                someone in it, and you had most of your room                (if still living with parents) or a separate                room (if grown up) devoted to your workshop                and equipment. astronomy — You figured everyone knew the difference between              a reflecting telescope and a refracting telescope              (since no one you knew didn’t know the difference),              "going out" on Friday and Saturday nights meant              staying up most of the night to look through your              telescope(s) or your male friend’s telescope(s),              you knew the masses and distances of all the planets,              you knew the names of several nearby stars and their              distances in both light-years and parsecs (Alpha              Centauri didn’t count, although you were supposed              to know this was part of a triple star system), and              you knew the names and distances of several galaxies              (Andromeda didn’t count). chemistry — You knew all the elements and could fill them in              on a blank periodic table chart, you’d been suspended              from school at least once or otherwise reprimanded              for an experiment that either went wrong or very well,              you had most of your room (if living with parents)              or a separate room (if grown up) devoted to your              chemistry lab, you were on the mailing list of a              least half a dozen major chemical supply companies              (and much of your basic equipment came from free              samples that the suppliers thought they were sending              out to a real company), and you were surprised              when anyone remarked that it was odd for a Star              Ship Captain to know how to make gunpowder (and              you fail every nerd category if you don’t know              what I’m talking about). Also, the terms were almost never applied to girls, especially "nerd", which was a male-only term when I was growing up. Virgo Cluster   "[10 Strange Discoveries] (#10) When Richard Ramirez, the    notorious U.S. mass murderer known as "Night Stalker",    failed a metal detector test at San Francisco County Jail,    X-rays detected a variety of items in his rectum, including    a small handcuff key, an empty syringe, a cap of a pen,    and a small piece of cellophane on which was printed the    words "I like chocolate." " << Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless    Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 421 >>

Response:

Related Posts

Leave a Reply