Act Acting » Theatre Acting » Wheeeeeeeeeeee, I'm baaaaaaack *gryns*

Wheeeeeeeeeeee, I'm baaaaaaack gryns

Question:

Was it any good? Costner is not a fav of mine nor are westerns but I’m still open minded I saw "Once upon a time in Mexico" this weekend — True "If guns are outlawed can we use swords instead?"

Response:

Ok, but it will have to wait. I’m reading Stephen Baxter’s Manifold Space right now, and need to read Manifold Origin afterwards.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – @corp.supernews.com: message

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – in message wrote in message message I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies. That works *chuckles* I saw, "Open Range" last night. How was it? The story is a good, basic western polot, but the characters were not properly developed. It is important for the audience to care about the characters, and to understand, or at least learn about them as the movie progresses. We learn almost nothing about the characters until the last half hour of the film, and by then it is too late to care about them. The only person who stands out in this film is Annette Bening, and she has a small part as it is. She is a genuinely convincing actress who makes every scene light up. Costner has clearly lost his edge as a director and made the mistake of directing and acting at the same time. Perhaps if he had stuck to one or the other, the film might have worked. Robert Duvall has a few good scenes here and there, but his acting skills are overshadowed by Costner’s poor direction. The best thing about the film is the homage to the spaghetti western at the climax, and even that is very weak. This could have been a great film, as it contained all the necessary elements for good film. Unfortunately, once you see this film, you will probably never want to see it again. Well, I feel that way about most films, so I guess it will go on the "will rent" list. It was good on the big theatre screen. It has a lot of wide, panoramic vistas of open cattle range that won’t make it to a television set, so I wouldn’t recommend it for rental unless you have a huge TV (43+ inches). BTW, I’m going to see Ridley Scott’s "Matchstick Men" soon. I’m pretty excited about this film. We’ll see. Vanity Fair gave it 3 stars! Thanks, but I only read reviews /after/ I have seen the film. How do you manage that? Ignore all newspapers, magazines, and NPR?

I don’t read reviews until after I have seen the film. First I see the film, and then I go to rottentomatoes.com and read all the reviews.

Response:

@corp.supernews.com: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – message message wrote in message message I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies. That works *chuckles* I saw, "Open Range" last night. How was it? The story is a good, basic western polot, but the characters were not properly developed. It is important for the audience to care about the characters, and to understand, or at least learn about them as the movie progresses. We learn almost nothing about the characters until the last half hour of the film, and by then it is too late to care about them. The only person who stands out in this film is Annette Bening, and she has a small part as it is. She is a genuinely convincing actress who makes every scene light up. Costner has clearly lost his edge as a director and made the mistake of directing and acting at the same time. Perhaps if he had stuck to one or the other, the film might have worked. Robert Duvall has a few good scenes here and there, but his acting skills are overshadowed by Costner’s poor direction. The best thing about the film is the homage to the spaghetti western at the climax, and even that is very weak. This could have been a great film, as it contained all the necessary elements for good film. Unfortunately, once you see this film, you will probably never want to see it again. Well, I feel that way about most films, so I guess it will go on the "will rent" list. It was good on the big theatre screen. It has a lot of wide, panoramic vistas of open cattle range that won’t make it to a television set, so I wouldn’t recommend it for rental unless you have a huge TV (43+ inches). BTW, I’m going to see Ridley Scott’s "Matchstick Men" soon. I’m pretty excited about this film. We’ll see. Vanity Fair gave it 3 stars! Thanks, but I only read reviews /after/ I have seen the film.

How do you manage that? Ignore all newspapers, magazines, and NPR?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – message

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. I much preferred Atlas Shrugged to The Fountainhead. It was much more extensive with her philosophy. I preferred The Fountainhead to Atlas Shrugged as well. I found I liked her individual look at things rather than a societal overview. However, I think that she could have benefited from a course in economics. *laughs* It’s true, actuallly. Her numbers are all wrong. So are a lot of things that she says, I wasn’t disagreeing. I should reread those books just so I have something to argue with you about. :) Ack, don’t make me go back to them…I’m scarred for life How about "Anthem"? I have that one sitting on my shelf. I heard it’s the best, but from a dubious source.

So you haven’t read it yet? How about giving us a review, Parse? You did sayy you wanted to review books, right?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – message message

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – wrote in message message I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies. That works *chuckles* I saw, "Open Range" last night. How was it? The story is a good, basic western polot, but the characters were not properly developed. It is important for the audience to care about the characters, and to understand, or at least learn about them as the movie progresses. We learn almost nothing about the characters until the last half hour of the film, and by then it is too late to care about them. The only person who stands out in this film is Annette Bening, and she has a small part as it is. She is a genuinely convincing actress who makes every scene light up. Costner has clearly lost his edge as a director and made the mistake of directing and acting at the same time. Perhaps if he had stuck to one or the other, the film might have worked. Robert Duvall has a few good scenes here and there, but his acting skills are overshadowed by Costner’s poor direction. The best thing about the film is the homage to the spaghetti western at the climax, and even that is very weak. This could have been a great film, as it contained all the necessary elements for good film. Unfortunately, once you see this film, you will probably never want to see it again. Well, I feel that way about most films, so I guess it will go on the "will rent" list. It was good on the big theatre screen. It has a lot of wide, panoramic vistas of open cattle range that won’t make it to a television set, so I wouldn’t recommend it for rental unless you have a huge TV (43+ inches). BTW, I’m going to see Ridley Scott’s "Matchstick Men" soon. I’m pretty excited about this film. We’ll see. Vanity Fair gave it 3 stars!

Thanks, but I only read reviews /after/ I have seen the film.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – message in message I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies. That works *chuckles* I saw, "Open Range" last night. How was it? The story is a good, basic western polot, but the characters were not properly developed. It is important for the audience to care about the characters, and to understand, or at least learn about them as the movie progresses. We learn almost nothing about the characters until the last half hour of the film, and by then it is too late to care about them. The only person who stands out in this film is Annette Bening, and she has a small part as it is. She is a genuinely convincing actress who makes every scene light up. Costner has clearly lost his edge as a director and made the mistake of directing and acting at the same time. Perhaps if he had stuck to one or the other, the film might have worked. Robert Duvall has a few good scenes here and there, but his acting skills are overshadowed by Costner’s poor direction. The best thing about the film is the homage to the spaghetti western at the climax, and even that is very weak. This could have been a great film, as it contained all the necessary elements for good film. Unfortunately, once you see this film, you will probably never want to see it again. Well, I feel that way about most films, so I guess it will go on the "will rent" list. It was good on the big theatre screen. It has a lot of wide, panoramic vistas of open cattle range that won’t make it to a television set, so I wouldn’t recommend it for rental unless you have a huge TV (43+ inches). BTW, I’m going to see Ridley Scott’s "Matchstick Men" soon. I’m pretty excited about this film. We’ll see.

Vanity Fair gave it 3 stars!

Response:

How was it?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – message

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – in message I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies. That works *chuckles* I saw, "Open Range" last night. How was it? The story is a good, basic western polot, but the characters were not properly developed. It is important for the audience to care about the characters, and to understand, or at least learn about them as the movie progresses. We learn almost nothing about the characters until the last half hour of the film, and by then it is too late to care about them. The only person who stands out in this film is Annette Bening, and she has a small part as it is. She is a genuinely convincing actress who makes every scene light up. Costner has clearly lost his edge as a director and made the mistake of directing and acting at the same time. Perhaps if he had stuck to one or the other, the film might have worked. Robert Duvall has a few good scenes here and there, but his acting skills are overshadowed by Costner’s poor direction. The best thing about the film is the homage to the spaghetti western at the climax, and even that is very weak. This could have been a great film, as it contained all the necessary elements for good film. Unfortunately, once you see this film, you will probably never want to see it again. Well, I feel that way about most films, so I guess it will go on the "will rent" list.

It was good on the big theatre screen. It has a lot of wide, panoramic vistas of open cattle range that won’t make it to a television set, so I wouldn’t recommend it for rental unless you have a huge TV (43+ inches). BTW, I’m going to see Ridley Scott’s "Matchstick Men" soon. I’m pretty excited about this film. We’ll see.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – message I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies. That works *chuckles* I saw, "Open Range" last night. How was it? The story is a good, basic western polot, but the characters were not properly developed. It is important for the audience to care about the characters, and to understand, or at least learn about them as the movie progresses. We learn almost nothing about the characters until the last half hour of the film, and by then it is too late to care about them. The only person who stands out in this film is Annette Bening, and she has a small part as it is. She is a genuinely convincing actress who makes every scene light up. Costner has clearly lost his edge as a director and made the mistake of directing and acting at the same time. Perhaps if he had stuck to one or the other, the film might have worked. Robert Duvall has a few good scenes here and there, but his acting skills are overshadowed by Costner’s poor direction. The best thing about the film is the homage to the spaghetti western at the climax, and even that is very weak. This could have been a great film, as it contained all the necessary elements for good film. Unfortunately, once you see this film, you will probably never want to see it again.

Well, I feel that way about most films, so I guess it will go on the "will rent" list.

Response:

Yes, it does. I’m thinking of seeing one tonight.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – message

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies. That works *chuckles* I saw, "Open Range" last night. How was it?

The story is a good, basic western polot, but the characters were not properly developed. It is important for the audience to care about the characters, and to understand, or at least learn about them as the movie progresses. We learn almost nothing about the characters until the last half hour of the film, and by then it is too late to care about them. The only person who stands out in this film is Annette Bening, and she has a small part as it is. She is a genuinely convincing actress who makes every scene light up. Costner has clearly lost his edge as a director and made the mistake of directing and acting at the same time. Perhaps if he had stuck to one or the other, the film might have worked. Robert Duvall has a few good scenes here and there, but his acting skills are overshadowed by Costner’s poor direction. The best thing about the film is the homage to the spaghetti western at the climax, and even that is very weak. This could have been a great film, as it contained all the necessary elements for good film. Unfortunately, once you see this film, you will probably never want to see it again.

Response:

How about "Anthem"?

Response:

I have that one sitting on my shelf. I heard it’s the best, but from a dubious source.

Response:

I saw, "Open Range" last night.

Response:

I should reread those books just so I have something to argue with you about. :)

Response:

Ack, don’t make me go back to them…I’m scarred for life — True "If guns are outlawed can we use swords instead?"

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies.

That works *chuckles* — True "If guns are outlawed can we use swords instead?"

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve explained to you what sig means to me, you simply do not like the explanation. I see you are still playing games. You haven’t explained anything to me. Who wrote the sig? In what context? You just aren’t very communicative. No games are being played. I’ve explained what the sig means to me. Ayn Rand wrote it and it’s from Atlas Shrugged. Thanks for the info, as it explains quite a bit. I dislike Ayn Rand, greatly. *chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. Show me one. We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others

Ok. I guess we could always stick to arguing about movies.

Response:

So are a lot of things that she says, I wasn’t disagreeing. — True "The lowest rings of hell are reserved for those, who in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality." Dante

Response:

We just recently argued over a quote from her book *chuckles*. Please don’t make me go back into it to find others — True "The lowest rings of hell are reserved for those, who in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality." Dante

Response:

It’s true, actuallly. Her numbers are all wrong.

Response:

Show me one.

Response:

*chuckles* You certainly aren’t required to like Ayn Rand and for the most part I don’t like her writing either, however there are some good things to be pulled out of the many pages of her books. I had to dig something worthwhile out of them since it took me like 6 years and major motivational work to finish Atlas Shrugged, ye gods that book was boring! — True "The lowest rings of hell are reserved for those, who in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality." Dante

Response:

I preferred The Fountainhead to Atlas Shrugged as well. I found I liked her individual look at things rather than a societal overview. However, I think that she could have benefited from a course in economics.

*laughs* — True "The lowest rings of hell are reserved for those, who in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality." Dante

Response:

I’m perfectly aware of what I’ve written and I haven’t copied anything. Judgement is defined as: – the act of judging or assessing a person or situation or event – the determination by a court of competent jurisdiction on matters submitted to it – the capacity to assess situations or circumstances shrewdly and to draw sound conclusions – the cognitive process of reaching a decision or drawing conclusions – an opinion formed by judging something – the legal document stating the reasons for a judicial decision – ability to make good judgments

Your point? Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately? Well, that statement could only be realized by suspending judgement. If you didn’t, you would think that your perspective was the only one possible, and you would judge others through your perceptual blinders. If you suspend you’re judgement you are turning off your mind. No, you’re not. I suggest you have a look at a dictionary since you don’t know what the word "judgement" means.

I understand what the word means just fine. Your original issue with the quote was more akin to being judgmental rather than forming a judgement. The suspension of judgement is an integral part of determining reality from fantasy.

I disagree. Your sig does not make any sense at all.

I’m sorry you feel that way….no wait, I’m not sorry — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." Welcome back. Would you mind explaining this sig to me? Thanks. What exactly are you not understanding? The whole thing, actually. Help me out. Suspension of judgement is an important aspect of determining reality. Why do you need to suspend judgement in order to determine reality? I suppose because prejudice (of all kinds) is harmful when trying to determine reality. Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately? Well, that statement could only be realized by suspending judgement. If you didn’t, you would think that your perspective was the only one possible, and you would judge others through your perceptual blinders. Judgement is often confused or aligned with judgementalism. I have gotten the impression that semantics is interfering in your conversation. Just a thought. True said: "Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately?" Yet, she also said: "…By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." judgement: * noun: the capacity to assess situations or circumstances shrewdly and to draw sound conclusions True’s position, "Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately," is an assessment, or judgement. Now what is this nonsense about negating "your person"? Please explain that to me. Your individuality.

Well, it’s not true. Can you demonstrate a context where it would be true? Can you give me an example to illustrate your point? — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death I was thrilled precariously-close to the edge of death and then decided to torment my roadies a bit more by staying alive. ;-} Yay…torment tis good Are you saying you like to torment us? Sure

With bad sigs, no doubt. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

You aren’t aware of what you have written, or what you have badly copied from somebody else. Judgement is defined as: – the act of judging or assessing a person or situation or event – the determination by a court of competent jurisdiction on matters submitted to it – the capacity to assess situations or circumstances shrewdly and to draw sound conclusions – the cognitive process of reaching a decision or drawing conclusions – an opinion formed by judging something – the legal document stating the reasons for a judicial decision – ability to make good judgments Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately? Well, that statement could only be realized by suspending judgement. If you didn’t, you would think that your perspective was the only one possible, and you would judge others through your perceptual blinders. If you suspend you’re judgement you are turning off your mind.

No, you’re not. I suggest you have a look at a dictionary since you don’t know what the word "judgement" means. The suspension of judgement is an integral part of determining reality from fantasy. Your sig does not make any sense at all. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death I don’t know about the death part, babe, but yeah, I be thrilled my little faery is back! hehehe

Wheeeee….yay!!! — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

Sure — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

Your individuality. — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death

I don’t know about the death part, babe, but yeah, I be thrilled my little faery is back! hehehe Gargoyle, The Evil Mr. Peanut – _~~~~~ The One. The Only. The Original. Have a salted peanut, dearie. I promise, it won’t hurt me one little bit. Hehehehe

Response:

But judgement is different from being judgemental. Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately? Well, that statement could only be realized by suspending judgement. If you didn’t, you would think that your perspective was the only one possible, and you would judge others through your perceptual blinders.

If you suspend you’re judgement you are turning off your mind. You are no longer an individual, you’ve become a sheep. — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

True said: "Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately?" Yet, she also said: "…By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." judgement: * noun: the capacity to assess situations or circumstances shrewdly and to draw sound conclusions True’s position, "Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately," is an assessment, or judgement. Now what is this nonsense about negating "your person"? Please explain that to me. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death I was thrilled precariously-close to the edge of death and then decided to torment my roadies a bit more by staying alive. ;-} Yay…torment tis good

Roadies – bad? ;p – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — True Trev (autograph for you, since you aren’t a roadie) :)

Response:

Judgement is often confused or aligned with judgementalism. I have gotten the impression that semantics is interfering in your conversation. Just a thought. Zsarnok – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." Welcome back. Would you mind explaining this sig to me? Thanks. What exactly are you not understanding? The whole thing, actually. Help me out. Suspension of judgement is an important aspect of determining reality. Why do you need to suspend judgement in order to determine reality? I suppose because prejudice (of all kinds) is harmful when trying to determine reality. Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately? Well, that statement could only be realized by suspending judgement. If you didn’t, you would think that your perspective was the only one possible, and you would judge others through your perceptual blinders. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." Welcome back. Would you mind explaining this sig to me? Thanks. What exactly are you not understanding? The whole thing, actually. Help me out. Suspension of judgement is an important aspect of determining reality. Why do you need to suspend judgement in order to determine reality? Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately?

Some things will exist, whether believed in or not. Those are the things that manifest independent of perspective. If no beings existed who perceived these things, they’d still be manifest. No one would know they did though. Did the oceans exist before you manifested and will they exist after your physical existance ends? ;) Interpreting those perceptions, now that’s where subjectivity rears it’s individualistic head! — True

Trev (can you perceive perception?) N. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

I suppose because prejudice (of all kinds) is harmful when trying to determine reality. Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately?

Well, that statement could only be realized by suspending judgement. If you didn’t, you would think that your perspective was the only one possible, and you would judge others through your perceptual blinders. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

Hey there! Zsarnok – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." Welcome back. Would you mind explaining this sig to me? Thanks. What exactly are you not understanding? — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death I was thrilled precariously-close to the edge of death and then decided to torment my roadies a bit more by staying alive. ;-}

Heh. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death I was thrilled precariously-close to the edge of death and then decided to torment my roadies a bit more by staying alive. ;-} Yay…torment tis good

Are you saying you like to torment us? — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

/,,,/ (o ,,o).. hehehehehe….

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death I was thrilled precariously-close to the edge of death and then decided to torment my roadies a bit more by staying alive. ;-}

Yay…torment tis good — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

Why do you need to suspend judgement in order to determine reality? Isn’t reality all a matter of perspective ultimately? — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death

I was thrilled precariously-close to the edge of death and then decided to torment my roadies a bit more by staying alive. ;-} — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

‘The meaning of life is to give life meaning.’ ;) Trev

Response:

"By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." Welcome back. Would you mind explaining this sig to me? Thanks. What exactly are you not understanding?

The whole thing, actually. Help me out. Suspension of judgement is an important aspect of determining reality. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

I’m sure you’re all thrilled to death — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

"By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Welcome back. Would you mind explaining this sig to me? Thanks. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

"By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person." Welcome back. Would you mind explaining this sig to me? Thanks.

What exactly are you not understanding? — True "By refusing to say ‘It is’, you are refusing to say ‘I am". By suspending your judgement, you are negating your person."

Response:

Permalink
In: Theatre Acting

You online HQ for everything ACTING

Home

Act Acting

Wheeeeeeeeeeee, I'm baaaaaaack *gryns*

Question:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Response:

Related Posts